The infamous McDonald's hot coffee case: Who sides with Stella? | Bart Durham Injury Law

The infamous McDonald's hot coffee case: Who sides with Stella?

If only Stella's morning was as idyllic as the one in this picture...


Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants

Originally posted on Dec. 14, as of today this CollegeHumor YouTube clip has 1.14 million views, roughly 40,000 thumbs up, and 932 thumbs down. It's captioned: Only a clown would serve coffee heated to 190 degrees(!). The clip profiles the infamous McDonald's hot coffee case, in which a customer spilled coffee and suffered third-degree burns.

Then she sued McDonald's for it and won, prompting critics to cast the legal system as distorted and out of control, and personal injury lawyers as parasitic villains.

The clip opens on a courtroom scene. A woman, facing criminal charges and worried about her future: "They throw innocent people in jail while some old lady who spills hot coffee on herself gets a million bucks." The narrator, in reply, says, "Ah, yes, the famous McDonald's hot coffee lawsuit. That case was terrible, but not for the reason you think. In fact, everything you've heard about it is wrong."

CollegeHumor Debunks Our Wayward Assumptions

The narrator goes on to debunk all the things we've come to believe about a lawsuit in which a woman (Stella Liebeck) spills hot coffee on herself and sues:

  • Contrary to prevailing assumption, Stella wasn't driving at the time she spilled the coffee; in fact, she was parked, and her grandson was in the driver's seat.
  • Stella freely admitted to spilling her coffee, that it was her mistake (again, contrary to the prevailing assumption that she disclaimed responsibility for spilling coffee on herself).
  • Stella sued not to "get rich," but to help pay for her medical bills (yet another assumption that Stella was just another greedy plaintiff).

Stella's injuries included third-degree burns on her legs and genitals, shock, and painful skin-graft operations - all because McDonald's unnecessarily served its coffee at 190 degrees.

Thumbs Up or Down? Do You Side with Stella?

Presumably, the 932 thumbs down (or dislikes) are by many of those critics, who refuse to side with the "old lady" who spilled coffee on herself and sued McDonald's to pay for her medical bills and near-death experience.

Watch the video below and decide for yourself.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Bart Durham Injury Law

You Deserve To Be Paid For What You've Gone Through

Our attorneys have more than 75 years of experience helping people like you.

Results For Our Clients

  • $3 Million Settlement - Passenger Hit By A Drunk Driver
  • $1 Million Judgment - Passenger Hit By A Drunk Driver
  • $1,450,000 Settlement - Passenger Hit By A Truck
More Client Results


  • "All of the staff members at Bart Durham Injury Law are very friendly and great to work with. They have open lines of communication with their clients, and respond in a timely manner. I trust them with my legal matters, and would advise anyone else in need of a lawyer to contact them first." - Julia Batson
  • "Bart Durham has a great team of people who are quick to respond and quick to help. The first time I met with them, they were kind and welcoming, and really listened to what I had to say. After my accident, I wasn't sure what to do, or how to get started. They took me through the process step by step, and got me the help I needed to continue on with my life. This is a friendly team with a dedication to helping people, and I'm so thankful for them!!" - Kara Davidson
More Testimonials