The differences between manufacturing defects and design defects | Bart Durham Injury Law

The differences between manufacturing defects and design defects

When a person is injured by a product, whether it might be inherently dangerous or not, the same questions always arise. How did the product injure the person? How severely was the person injured? Could the injury have been predicted? How did the product cause the injury? Was there an issue with the product that could have caused the injury?

The biggest difference between manufacturing defects and design defects is that manufacturing defects were not intended, while design defects were intended. For example, a table was constructed, but it fell apart because one of the legs was not installed properly. This is a manufacturing defect. A design defect is when a table is designed to have just three legs. Because the table would tip over easily, it is a defect from the design.

Courts impose liability on manufacturers in hopes that they will put more of an emphasis and investment on product safety. This is in lieu of a fault-based liability system. Manufacturers are held liable for manufacturing defects that injure people even if they did their best to build the product and keep it as safe as possible.

The plaintiff is required to show the burden of proof in a manufacturing defect case that the product caused an injury due to a fault or a defect of the product. In most circumstances, the defect is caused by the negligence of the manufacturer, but it can be almost impossible for the plaintiff to prove this in court.

In most courts, a product is deemed defectively designed because it is unreasonably dangerous to the design. These products are defined differently. Some are unreasonably dangerous because they are more dangerous than a consumer would expect or because the risks of using a product are so great that a reasonable seller will not put the product on the market for sale. Another definition is when the design of a product has risks that far outweigh the benefits.

Visit our page to learn more about design and manufacturing defects and your rights in these cases.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Bart Durham Injury Law

You Deserve To Be Paid For What You've Gone Through

Our attorneys have more than 75 years of experience helping people like you.

Results For Our Clients

  • $3 Million Settlement - Passenger Hit By A Drunk Driver
  • $1 Million Judgment - Passenger Hit By A Drunk Driver
  • $1,450,000 Settlement - Passenger Hit By A Truck
More Client Results


  • "All of the staff members at Bart Durham Injury Law are very friendly and great to work with. They have open lines of communication with their clients, and respond in a timely manner. I trust them with my legal matters, and would advise anyone else in need of a lawyer to contact them first." - Julia Batson
  • "Bart Durham has a great team of people who are quick to respond and quick to help. The first time I met with them, they were kind and welcoming, and really listened to what I had to say. After my accident, I wasn't sure what to do, or how to get started. They took me through the process step by step, and got me the help I needed to continue on with my life. This is a friendly team with a dedication to helping people, and I'm so thankful for them!!" - Kara Davidson
More Testimonials